Apex Capital vs RTS Financial: Which Should You Use?
A field-by-field comparison of Apex Capital and RTS Financial — published terms, positioning, who each suits, and what to check before signing. Our commercial position on both is stated up front.
Our position on both
We have no commercial relationship with Apex Capital. We have no commercial relationship with RTS Financial. See the full rate card.
Apex Capital and RTS Financial both provide freight factoring, and on the surface the products look similar. The differences that matter are in positioning, contract posture and what each company is willing to publish. This page puts them side by side on the same fields.
Published terms, side by side
| Field | Apex Capital | RTS Financial |
|---|---|---|
| Recourse | Non-recourse options | Not published |
| Contract | No long-term contracts | Not published |
| Monthly minimum | None (no volume minimums) | Not published |
Apex Capital terms from www.apexcapitalcorp.com — read 2026-07-29. We re-check monthly.
Only terms at least one company publishes are shown. Neither publishes: advertised rate, typical small-operator rate, advance rate. We never fill a gap with an estimate. Method →
What each is actually optimising for
Apex Capital
One of the few large trucking factors that publishes its contract posture — no long-term contracts, no minimums — rather than only its features.
- No long-term contracts
- No volume minimums
- Non-recourse options
- Fuel card
- Load board
- Equipment financing
- Blynk same-day pay
RTS Financial
A full operating stack for mid-size fleets, with factoring as the entry point rather than the whole product.
- Fuel card
- Load board
- Equipment financing
- Insurance
- Same-day funding
- Fleet services
Choose Apex Capital if
- Carriers who have been burned by an auto-renewing contract elsewhere
- Irregular or seasonal operations that would fail a monthly minimum
- Owner-operators who want a large factor without a long lock-in
Choose RTS Financial if
- Fleets big enough to actually use the bundled fuel card and load board
- Carriers who want one vendor for factoring, fuel, insurance and equipment finance
- Operators who value scale and a long operating history over the lowest rate
Where each one is the wrong choice
Skip Apex Capital if
- You want a published rate — Apex publishes contract terms but not pricing
- You need the absolute cheapest rate and will trade flexibility for it
Skip RTS Financial if
- You are one truck and will not use the ecosystem — you are paying for breadth you do not need
- You want your rate and contract terms published before a sales call
- You need month-to-month flexibility from day one
Compare financing options across 75+ lenders, including accounts receivable financing →Speak with an advisor. Checking options does not affect your credit. We may earn a commission — see the rate card.
What to check with each before signing
Apex Capital
"No hidden fees" is a marketing claim, not a fee schedule. Ask for the full list — ACH/wire, same-day surcharge, credit checks, and what Blynk costs.
RTS Financial
RTS does not publish rates, advance or contract length anywhere on its site. Get all four in writing — rate and period, advance, term length, and termination notice — before signing.
How to actually decide between them
With rate data incomplete on both sides — which is the normal condition of this market — the decision comes down to four things you can establish yourself in one phone call to each.
- Will they take you? Authority age, business size or industry, and volume floor. This eliminates one of them more often than price does.
- What does a slow month cost? The monthly minimum, not the rate, is what hurts at low volume. Price your worst realistic month under each.
- How do you get out? Term, notice window, termination fee, UCC release speed. Ask for all four in writing.
- What does the non-recourse actually cover? Request the covered-event definition, and one example of a claim each has declined.
Then put the two written offers in front of each other. Quoted terms in this market move when there is a credible alternative on the table, and they rarely move without one.
Our read on each
Apex Capital: The published no-minimum, no-long-contract stance is genuinely unusual at this size and worth a quote.
RTS Financial: Strongest when you use the whole stack. Weakest if you just want cheap factoring with a short contract.
Both judgements are about published positioning and structure, not about a rate verified for your specific business.
Full reviews
- Apex Capital review — published terms, who it suits, what to check
- RTS Financial review — published terms, who it suits, what to check
Compare against all 34 companies in the index →