Invoice FactoringINDEX

We earn referral commissions from some companies listed on this site. We publish every relationship and every rate on our How We Make Money page. Commission never changes a ranking. See the rate card →

Two identical coffee cups side by side, shot from above

Quickpay Funding vs RTS Financial: Which Should You Use?

A field-by-field comparison of Quickpay Funding and RTS Financial — published terms, positioning, who each suits, and what to check before signing. Our commercial position on both is stated up front.

Our position on both

We have no commercial relationship with Quickpay Funding. We have no commercial relationship with RTS Financial. See the full rate card.

Quickpay Funding and RTS Financial both provide freight factoring, and on the surface the products look similar. The differences that matter are in positioning, contract posture and what each company is willing to publish. This page puts them side by side on the same fields.

Published terms, side by side

FieldQuickpay FundingRTS Financial
Advance rate80%–98%Not published
Monthly minimumNone (no monthly or volume minimums)Not published

Quickpay Funding terms from quickpayfunding.com — read 2026-07-29. We re-check monthly.

Only terms at least one company publishes are shown. Neither publishes: advertised rate, typical small-operator rate, recourse, contract. We never fill a gap with an estimate. Method →

What each is actually optimising for

Quickpay Funding

Competes explicitly on funding speed and on having no minimums — and publishes both.

  • 80–98% advance published
  • No monthly or volume minimums
  • 24/7 same-day funding incl. weekends
  • Free credit checks
  • Fuel card

RTS Financial

A full operating stack for mid-size fleets, with factoring as the entry point rather than the whole product.

  • Fuel card
  • Load board
  • Equipment financing
  • Insurance
  • Same-day funding
  • Fleet services

Choose Quickpay Funding if

  • Carriers who deliver on weekends and holidays and want funding then, not Monday
  • Irregular-volume operations that minimums would penalise
  • Owner-operators who want a published advance range

Choose RTS Financial if

  • Fleets big enough to actually use the bundled fuel card and load board
  • Carriers who want one vendor for factoring, fuel, insurance and equipment finance
  • Operators who value scale and a long operating history over the lowest rate

Where each one is the wrong choice

Skip Quickpay Funding if

  • You want the lowest rate and can wait a day for funding
  • You need a large bundled ecosystem

Skip RTS Financial if

  • You are one truck and will not use the ecosystem — you are paying for breadth you do not need
  • You want your rate and contract terms published before a sales call
  • You need month-to-month flexibility from day one

Compare financing options across 75+ lenders, including accounts receivable financing →Speak with an advisor. Checking options does not affect your credit. We may earn a commission — see the rate card.

What to check with each before signing

Quickpay Funding

The advance range 80–98% is wide. Where you land inside it depends on your customer credit — ask for your specific advance rate, not the range.

RTS Financial

RTS does not publish rates, advance or contract length anywhere on its site. Get all four in writing — rate and period, advance, term length, and termination notice — before signing.

How to actually decide between them

With rate data incomplete on both sides — which is the normal condition of this market — the decision comes down to four things you can establish yourself in one phone call to each.

  1. Will they take you? Authority age, business size or industry, and volume floor. This eliminates one of them more often than price does.
  2. What does a slow month cost? The monthly minimum, not the rate, is what hurts at low volume. Price your worst realistic month under each.
  3. How do you get out? Term, notice window, termination fee, UCC release speed. Ask for all four in writing.
  4. What does the non-recourse actually cover? Request the covered-event definition, and one example of a claim each has declined.

Then put the two written offers in front of each other. Quoted terms in this market move when there is a credible alternative on the table, and they rarely move without one.

Our read on each

Quickpay Funding: The speed and no-minimums claims are published and specific, which is rare. Get your advance rate pinned down.

RTS Financial: Strongest when you use the whole stack. Weakest if you just want cheap factoring with a short contract.

Both judgements are about published positioning and structure, not about a rate verified for your specific business.

Full reviews

Compare against all 34 companies in the index →

Frequently asked

Is Quickpay Funding or RTS Financial cheaper?
Neither publishes enough for us to declare a winner on price. Advertised rates are not quotes, and the cheaper headline frequently loses once advance rate, monthly minimums and per-transfer fees are included. Model both against a realistic month of your own invoicing.
What is the main difference between Quickpay Funding and RTS Financial?
Quickpay Funding: Competes explicitly on funding speed and on having no minimums — and publishes both. RTS Financial: A full operating stack for mid-size fleets, with factoring as the entry point rather than the whole product.
Which is better for a small operation?
At low volume the decision is usually driven by monthly minimums and per-transfer fees rather than the discount rate, because fixed costs dominate percentage costs. Check both providers' minimums first — it eliminates one of them more often than price does.
How do I switch between them?
The incoming factor buys out your outstanding invoices from the outgoing one. Check your termination notice window and the UCC-1 release timing before you start — those are what stall a switch, not the buyout itself.